Klaviyo vs Mailchimp: the same $100, counted two different ways
At 5,000 people both platforms charge $100 a month at list price — and they get there by counting completely different things. Every figure read at klaviyo.com/pricing and mailchimp.com/pricing/marketing on 24 September 2026, in a US-configured browser. Neither company pays this site anything.
Paid links on this page. Links that begin /go/ are partner links: follow one, subscribe, and the platform sends Reorderly a share of what you pay. Omnisend, Sender and Moosend are the only three that can. Klaviyo, Mailchimp, Brevo and Shopify pay this site nothing and are linked plainly wherever they are the right answer — which, on several pages here, they are. The full arrangement is written down.
Klaviyo and Mailchimp both cost $100 a month for a five-thousand-person list, and almost nothing else about them is comparable. Klaviyo bills by active profiles and is built around what a store's customers do; Mailchimp bills by contacts with a send allowance attached, halves its price for the first year, and serves a much broader set of businesses than online stores.
Neither of them pays this site anything, which is worth stating before the first figure rather than after the last one. Every price here was read at the two companies' own pricing pages on 24 September 2026, in a browser configured for the United States, with every toggle opened individually.
The short answer
Choose Klaviyo if the store's revenue already depends on segmentation — what someone browsed, what they bought last, how likely they are to buy again — and you are prepared to pay for every recently-active profile whether you mail them or not. Choose Mailchimp if you want a broad marketing tool at a predictable contact price and can live with the rate doubling after twelve months.
If the answer to both is "neither, quite", the platforms that bill by emails sent are a genuinely different shape of deal, and they are compared alongside these two on the main comparison.
What each one counts
This is the whole difference, and every price consequence follows from it.
Klaviyo's meter is active profiles: people who have engaged with your store recently. A profile that goes quiet eventually stops being billable, which sounds generous until you notice the corollary — a seasonal store whose customers all became active in November is paying November's price. Mailchimp's meter is contacts, a flat count of the list, with a monthly send allowance attached to each tier: ten times the contact count on Essentials, twelve times on Standard, fifteen times on Premium, according to Mailchimp's own feature table.
So Klaviyo asks how lively your audience is and Mailchimp asks how big your list is. Two stores with identical revenue can land on opposite sides of that question.
Price, side by side
| People on the list | Klaviyo Email | Klaviyo Marketing | Mailchimp Standard (list) | Mailchimp Standard (first 12 months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $20/mo | $78/mo | $20/mo | $10/mo |
| 1,500 | $45/mo | $103/mo | $45/mo | $22.50/mo |
| 3,000 | $70/mo | $128/mo | $100/mo (2,501–5,000 band) | $50/mo |
| 5,000 | $100/mo | $158/mo | $100/mo | $50/mo |
| 10,000 | $150/mo | $208/mo | $230/mo (10,001–15,000 band) | $115/mo |
| 25,000 | $400/mo | $544/mo | $340/mo (25,001–30,000 band) | $170/mo |
Klaviyo and Mailchimp at matched list sizes, read at klaviyo.com/pricing and mailchimp.com/pricing/marketing on 24 September 2026, in US dollars. Mailchimp's introductory rate runs for twelve months; the list rate is what follows.
The two are identical to 5,000. Above that they cross twice: Mailchimp is dearer at 10,000 and cheaper at 25,000, because their bands step at different points.
The crossing is the interesting part. Up to 5,000 people the two platforms charge the same list price. At 10,000 Mailchimp is $80 a month more; at 25,000 it is $60 a month less. Neither is simply the expensive one, and a comparison that says otherwise has picked a single list size and stopped.
The offers on both pages, and what they hide
Both companies headline a number that is not the ongoing rate, in opposite ways.
Mailchimp's is straightforward once seen: every card reads "$X/mo for 12 months" with "then, starts at $Y" underneath, and at every tier read here, Y was exactly twice X. A store budgeting from the headline is budgeting for half of its second year.
Klaviyo's is shorter and easier to miss. At 500 profiles the Email card headlines $1 against a struck-through $20, flagged $19 OFF, with a footnote describing $19 off the first month. There is also a gap the page does not resolve: the same $19 OFF flag appears on the Marketing card at $59 against $78, while the footnote beneath it says the offer applies to "the $20 email plan". Both numbers are printed here as they were read, and this page does not choose between them.
What you get for the money
On features the comparison is less even than the prices suggest, and it runs in Klaviyo's favour for stores specifically.
- Klaviyo publishes predictive analytics, onsite personalisation, product recommendations, loyalty rewards, order tracking and a customer self-service hub on its Marketing plan, plus 350+ integrations and A/B testing from the Email plan up.
- Mailchimp publishes up to 200 automation flows on Standard and Premium against four flow steps on Essentials, generative AI features at no extra cost on the upper two tiers, custom-coded templates, and 300+ integrations across all paid tiers.
- Seats differ sharply: Mailchimp gives three on Essentials, five on Standard and unlimited on Premium. Klaviyo does not tier seats on the plans read here.
- Mailchimp offers a 15% discount to nonprofits and charities, requested after signup — the only such published discount among the platforms this site covers.
Mailchimp is the broader marketing tool; Klaviyo is the deeper store tool. That is a genuine difference in kind rather than a scoreline, which is part of why this site publishes no scores.
What happens when you go over
Mailchimp states the consequence plainly on its pricing page and it is worth knowing before a busy month: "Overages apply if contact or email send limit is exceeded" on the paid tiers, and on the free plan, "Sending will be paused if contact or email send limit is exceeded". A store that sends more than twelve emails per contact in December on Standard is into overage territory.
Klaviyo's Email plan lists a monthly send allowance on the plan card — 5,000 emails a month at 500 profiles — and its free tier is 250 profiles and 500 emails. The consequence of exceeding it is not stated on the pricing page, so this site does not describe one.
If neither fits
Both of these are worth measuring against the cheaper contact-metered platforms before committing, because at 5,000 people the same store costs $39 a month on Sender and $48 on Moosend against $100 on either of these two — and against $65 on Brevo, which counts emails rather than people.
The Klaviyo alternatives worth considering, and the Klaviyo–Omnisend head-to-head specifically, are set out separately.
Questions this page gets asked
Is Klaviyo more expensive than Mailchimp?
Not consistently — they cross twice. At list prices read on 24 September 2026, the two are identical up to 5,000 people: $20 a month at 500, $45 at 1,500, $100 at 5,000. At 10,000 Klaviyo's Email plan is $150 against Mailchimp Standard's $230, so Klaviyo is cheaper. At 25,000 Klaviyo is $400 against Mailchimp's $340, so Mailchimp is cheaper. Mailchimp also halves its rate for the first twelve months, which Klaviyo does not do beyond a first-month offer. Which is dearer genuinely depends on your list size.
Why does Klaviyo charge by active profiles instead of contacts?
Because its pricing follows engagement rather than list size, which cuts both ways for a store. A profile that has gone quiet eventually drops out of the billable count, so a list with a long dormant tail costs less at Klaviyo than at a contact-metered platform. The reverse is also true: a seasonal spike in engagement raises the bill even if you send nothing extra, and you have less direct control over the number than you do over a contact count you can prune yourself.
Can I switch from Mailchimp to Klaviyo without losing my automations?
Your contact data moves readily; your automations generally do not, because the two platforms model triggers and conditions differently and a flow has to be rebuilt rather than imported. Plan the rebuild as real work rather than a migration step. Reorderly has not run either migration and so describes no timeline for it — what can be said from the vendors' published material is that Omnisend, separately, advertises a free migration service in up to five days, and neither Klaviyo nor Mailchimp publishes an equivalent offer on the pricing pages read here.
Does Mailchimp still make sense for an online store in 2026?
It can, particularly below 5,000 contacts where its first-year rate is half of Klaviyo's list price for the same list, and for a business that is not only a store. Where it is weaker for stores specifically is depth of behavioural triggering — browse abandonment and replenishment flows built on what someone actually did on the site. If the store's plan is to grow revenue through segmentation, that gap matters more than the first year's saving.